Another metal frame and glass addition approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission

By: Scott Henson

Henry Melcher reports for The Architect’s Newspaper: BKSK-designed topper for the Meatpacking District gets Landmarks’ blessing.

4549ceca6cd3c1c7d62af15f3e1eec75

BKSK’s revised design for 9-19 9th Street.

And another glass and metal addition is set to rise atop a low-rise building in the Meatpacking District. The Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) has voted to approve the BKSK-designed topper to the two-story building at 9–19 9th Avenue, which is best known for housing Keith McNally’s famous French bistro, Pastis.

8c601afc5ca7ab28e34a08bd4940948d

The revised design from the north.

An alternate proposal by the firm was shot down by the LPC in May, in what Curbed described as a heated, and very, very crowded, hearing. According to the blog, local residents called the addition “garish,” “a disoriented layer cake,” and “an obliteration of a historic district.” BKSK has a positive track record of working with Landmarks, however, and the firm came back with a revised plan, which has just won the LPC’s blessing. Harry Kendall, a principal at the firm, told AN that the while the structure has largely stayed the same,  the “architectural language of the design” has changed. Essentially, BKSK is using less glass. “The metal frame has taken a more central role as an element of the facade and glass panels are clipped between the frames as a secondary element,” Kendall said.

66e514c21a37d49b0a94f505acb1ec22

Close-up of the addition.

He explained that at the hearing in May, the commission suggested BKSK work harder to do less. “We did that,” Kendall said. “We applied ourselves diligently to doing less.” But, according to Andrew Berman, the executive director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, less is not enough.

“We are extremely disappointed with this vote, the last to take place under outgoing LPC Chair Tierney,” Berman said in a statement. “Once more the Commission approved a design in direct contradiction to their own prior recommendations, in which they told the applicant to substantially change the design, and that it was too large (the size of the addition is relatively unchanged).”

5d1b9d9b25ec8aca8857911d1f583eae

The facade looking west.

43300b941f6a00e9d70922cafd739672

The street level.

30796a9f4443bfe043a6383cb5832352

The old design.

Sign up for our newsletter

First name
Last name

Sign up for our newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive our periodic newsletter that includes a summary of our latest articles and current events.